On Tue, 29 Mar 2005, Koblinger Egmont wrote:
> On the other hand, they failed to understand that they wouldn't need to
> upgrade mhonarc, they'd only have to apply a rather small fix (inserting no
> more than two(!) bytes to one of the perl files), so they could stick to
> their current version of mhonarc (2.6.8)...
Uh, no, if they have to hand-apply a fix, that turns it into a custom
version -- it's *not* 2.6.8 any more. Particularly if they don't have
Perl programming expertise on hand to verify that the fix is harmless,
it's not surprising that they're reluctant to do that. Unfortunate, yes,
but not surprising.
Henry Spencer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Linux-UTF8: i18n of Linux on all levels
Archive: http://mail.nl.linux.org/linux-utf8/
