Abel Cheung wrote:
On 11/18/05, Behdad Esfahbod <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Because paps is quite under development right now.
But I still packaged it and uploaded to Mandriva Linux. :-)
Yes, comparing to u2ps (which halted development for some time)
paps is indeed a better solution, though both looks similar.
There is a new version (6.1) on paps.sourceforge.net. With paps
6.1, boxes drawn with utf-8 'box draw characters' are printed
correctly, without gaps.
Regards, Jan
--
Linux-UTF8: i18n of Linux on all levels
Archive: http://mail.nl.linux.org/linux-utf8/
