On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 02:29:34PM +0200, Werner LEMBERG wrote: > > Since I have no idea about Indic scripts, I won't and can't give a > comment. I just want to note that Emacs supports Devanagari with > single, double, and triple width glyphs (IIRC); you may have a look > how they've done it -- from a technical point, not from an encoding > point.
There is a bug (that I have not investigated) in the use of "emacs -nw" on a uxterm. When symbols occur on the line of which no glyph is available, then emacs and uxterm have different ideas about the width of displayed strings, and corruption results. Andries -- Linux-UTF8: i18n of Linux on all levels Archive: http://mail.nl.linux.org/linux-utf8/
