On Sat, Mar 31, 2007 at 06:36:06PM -0400, Daniel B. wrote: > ???????? wrote: > > > > > > The fact that your mailer misinterpreted my UTF-8 as Latin-1 does not > > > > instill faith... > > > > > > Maybe you should think more clearly. I didn't write my mailer, so the > > > quality of its behavior doesn't reflect my knowledge. > > > > it does reflect your lack of interesting in getting your email utf-8 > > compatible. > > How the hell do you think you know what it reflects? (Have you ever > considered it might have something to do with bookmark management?)
Just because you insist on using an ancient, horribly broken, proprietary web browser to manage your bookmarks doesn't mean you have to use it for email too... especially when it breaks email so badly. In any case it reflects priorities I think, and also indicates that you're using backwards software, which goes alongside with discussing the UTF-8 issue as if we were living in 1997 instead of 2007. All of this is stuff you're entitled to do if you like, and it's not really my business to tell you what you should be using. But it does reframe the discussion. Rich -- Linux-UTF8: i18n of Linux on all levels Archive: http://mail.nl.linux.org/linux-utf8/
