Hi Martin,
Martin Rubli wrote:
>> That sounds neat .. I had a go at trying this, but I ran into a few
>> problems.
>> The patch applied without problems, but I couldn't get bayer.c to
>> compile.
>> I used fswebcam to set the control (which seems to work) and dump the
>> frame, but all I've managed to get so far is a nasty pattern that's
sore
>> on the eyes:
>> http://www.firestorm.cx/files/bayer/
>> I'm running a QuickCam Fusion at 1280x960. The image should be almost
>> totally black. (The camera is in a box at the other end of town :-)
>
> What was the error you got when you tried to compile bayer.c?
Attached below. I was able to get it built by #define'ing the controls
directly in bayer.c.
Your bayer app seems to have kickstarted something - fswebcam is now
able to dump the data fine, and I'm getting a proper image. The strage
thing is that now I can't reproduce the original problem. I've tried
everything but unplugging the camera, and I'll try that later today.
Thanks for your help!
-Phil
----------
$ gcc bayer.c -o bayer
In file included from uvcvideo.h:8,
from bayer.c:21:
uvc_compat.h:4:40: error: missing binary operator before token "("
uvc_compat.h:18:40: error: missing binary operator before token "("
uvc_compat.h:37:40: error: missing binary operator before token "("
uvc_compat.h:53:35: warning: trigraph ??) ignored, use -trigraphs to enable
uvc_compat.h:59:40: error: missing binary operator before token "("
uvc_compat.h:70:23: error: asm/mutex.h: No such file or directory
uvc_compat.h:73:40: error: missing binary operator before token "("
uvc_compat.h:117:40: error: missing binary operator before token "("
----------
_______________________________________________
Linux-uvc-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/linux-uvc-devel
