On Sunday 18 November 2007, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > Hi Jon, > > On Saturday 17 November 2007, Jon Petitta wrote: > > Laurent, > > > > I have the same webcam as Patrice, and can not get uvc to recognize the > > camera. I wanted to post the information that you where looking for, and > > hopefully find a resolution for this. > > > > Jon > > > > lsusb > > ****************** > > > > Bus 002 Device 009: ID 045e:00f4 Microsoft Corp. > > Device Descriptor: > > bLength 18 > > bDescriptorType 1 > > bcdUSB 2.00 > > bDeviceClass 0 (Defined at Interface level) > > bDeviceSubClass 0 > > bDeviceProtocol 0 > > bMaxPacketSize0 64 > > idVendor 0x045e Microsoft Corp. > > idProduct 0x00f4 > > bcdDevice 1.00 > > iManufacturer 0 > > iProduct 1 > > iSerial 0 > > bNumConfigurations 1 > > Configuration Descriptor: > > bLength 9 > > bDescriptorType 2 > > wTotalLength 382 > > bNumInterfaces 3 > > bConfigurationValue 1 > > iConfiguration 0 > > bmAttributes 0x80 > > (Bus Powered) > > MaxPower 500mA > > Interface Descriptor: > > bLength 9 > > bDescriptorType 4 > > bInterfaceNumber 0 > > bAlternateSetting 0 > > bNumEndpoints 3 > > bInterfaceClass 255 Vendor Specific Class > > bInterfaceSubClass 255 Vendor Specific Subclass > > bInterfaceProtocol 255 Vendor Specific Protocol > > iInterface 0 > > [snip] > > That's a very different device. "255 Vendor Specific Class" means the > device is not UVC compliant (would have been "14 Video" otherwise). I'm > afraid that webcam will probably never be supported by the Linux UVC > driver.
I mean very different from the NX-6000, not the one Patrice reported :-) Best regards, Laurent Pinchart _______________________________________________ Linux-uvc-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/linux-uvc-devel
