On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 09:32:42PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> I can thus only judge the quality of MS cameras by the number of
> user requests I receive. I can't tell you about the VX-6000, but
> someone tried the VX-7000 without success.
You judge the quality, and?
I've been watching out for an affordable 1.3 Mpixel webcam for a while
now, and I always thought the VX-6000 was a decent uvc-supported
candidate... And it's been out for years now, so I'd guess someone
would've tried it by now.
> I would advice going for Logitech cameras. If you need good light
> sensitivity, go for a high-end device.
But here you don't say someone has tried.... Do you think they will
work?
The cameras have marketing specs of "video up to 1280x1024", and
"frame rates up to 30 fps". I can of course accept that it's possible
to run at lower framerates and framesizes. But my experience is that
when they formulate it like this, the camera can't do 1280x1024 at
30fps... Do you have hints that this camera is capable of
1280x1...@30fps?
Roger.
--
** [email protected] ** http://www.BitWizard.nl/ ** +31-15-2600998 **
** Delftechpark 26 2628 XH Delft, The Netherlands. KVK: 27239233 **
*-- BitWizard writes Linux device drivers for any device you may have! --*
Q: It doesn't work. A: Look buddy, doesn't work is an ambiguous statement.
Does it sit on the couch all day? Is it unemployed? Please be specific!
Define 'it' and what it isn't doing. --------- Adapted from lxrbot FAQ
_______________________________________________
Linux-uvc-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/linux-uvc-devel
