The Pro9000 has several versions depending on the year (2007,2008,2009) At least compared with the older models the c600 seems to have better firmware, although in terms of lenses, yes the pro9000 is better (also MJPEG frames seem to have a lower compression ratio producing better pictures, in terms of audio most older models, even from other manufactures have a 16000 hz sample ratio)
In the end it just depends on what you want/need from a webcam, in my case I use a stereo mic connected to my board, so it doesn't bother me at all the quality of the camera mic. Best regards, Paulo > > Sorry, but I didn't understand: The C600 for example seems to > be worst than the Quickcam Pro 9000 right? I mean, no Carl Zeis Lens > etc... So there's no advantage in buying some of them. > > It's really strange Logitech opted for using a cheap microphone > on Quickcam Pro 9000 (which should be one of the best webcams in the > world ;). > > > -- > Linux 2.6.31: Man-Eating Seals of Antiquity > > > _______________________________________________ > Linux-uvc-devel mailing list > Linux-uvc-devel@lists.berlios.de > https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/linux-uvc-devel > _______________________________________________ Linux-uvc-devel mailing list Linux-uvc-devel@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/linux-uvc-devel
