Am Dienstag, 1. Dezember 2009 01:38:07 schrieb Greg KH:
> On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 10:15:04PM +0100, Stephan Diestelhorst wrote:
> > Am Montag 23 November 2009 10:20:46 schrieb Oliver Neukum:
> > > Am Samstag, 21. November 2009 17:56:30 schrieb Alan Stern:
> > > this version should be efficient.
> > > Stephan, please test.
> >
> > I have increased the delay to 1000us, as discussed and added a
> > tested-by notice.
> >
> > Is my back-port of interest to anyone?
>
> backport to what? An older kernel version?
>
> Should I take this version instead as the delay is longer?
The maximum delay of 1000 microseconds is the correct one.
Earlier experimentation was based on one of two possible scenarios.
HTH
Oliver
_______________________________________________
Linux-uvc-devel mailing list
Linux-uvc-devel@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/linux-uvc-devel
