Hi, On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 13:30:16 +0100, pal...@gmail.com wrote: > In order to do a good documentation, I was finding a static code > analyzer (do you know a good one?)
I like cppcheck myself, it has helped me find several minor and major bloopers in my code: http://cppcheck.wiki.sourceforge.net/ > I don't believe so much in this kind of programs, but I prefer to > contact you with Rats results warnings. Looks like a lot of "please double-check here" hints. And I am convinced that kernel code commits are double-checked in this manner quite extensively. Never hurts having yet another tool though. Moritz _______________________________________________ Linux-uvc-devel mailing list Linux-uvc-devel@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/linux-uvc-devel
