On Sunday 06 March 2011 14:02:08 Carlos Silva wrote: > On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 12:57, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > On Sunday 06 March 2011 13:55:16 Carlos Silva wrote: > > > On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 10:56, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > > > On Sunday 20 February 2011 00:50:04 Carlos Silva wrote: > > > > > OK, just tested with no quirks and it works. Want me to send a > > > > > patch for it? > > > > > > > > If no quirk is required, you don't need to patch the driver. It will > > > > work out of the box. > > > > > > Huummmm no. The device wasn't there. I had to added it myself (the > > > deviceid). At least on my kernel version... :/ > > > Just checked and it's not on the latest kernel either. > > > > What I mean is that the device entry doesn't need to be there. The driver > > should work out of the box without an entry for your device. > > Ah, ok! But it didn't work... I can try again with a more recent kernel, > but this 2.6.37 it didn't work.
How does it fail ? What are the log messages printed in the kernel log when you load the driver ? -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart _______________________________________________ Linux-uvc-devel mailing list Linux-uvc-devel@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/linux-uvc-devel
