From: Johannes Berg <[email protected]>

There's no reason to ever set invalid CW_min/CW_max to the
drivers, we should catch it in higher layers. However, the
consequences of setting it wrong can be quite severe, so
double-check at a low level and error out for invalid data.

Change-Id: Ibf01670252676f2b6238308e0e2ef74475fbc1b0
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <[email protected]>
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.rds.intel.com/45309
Tested-by: IWL Jenkins
---
 net/mac80211/driver-ops.h | 6 ++++++
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)

diff --git a/net/mac80211/driver-ops.h b/net/mac80211/driver-ops.h
index 1bbb0790264f..3df28e0fa045 100644
--- a/net/mac80211/driver-ops.h
+++ b/net/mac80211/driver-ops.h
@@ -631,6 +631,12 @@ static inline int drv_conf_tx(struct ieee80211_local 
*local,
        if (!check_sdata_in_driver(sdata))
                return -EIO;
 
+       if (WARN_ONCE(params->cw_min == 0 ||
+                     params->cw_min > params->cw_max,
+                     "%s: invalid CW_min/CW_max: %d/%d\n",
+                     sdata->name, params->cw_min, params->cw_max))
+               return -EINVAL;
+
        trace_drv_conf_tx(local, sdata, ac, params);
        if (local->ops->conf_tx)
                ret = local->ops->conf_tx(&local->hw, &sdata->vif,
-- 
2.1.0

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to