On Wed, 2014-11-19 at 13:40 +0200, Arik Nemtsov wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 1:22 PM, Johannes Berg
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Sun, 2014-11-09 at 18:50 +0200, Arik Nemtsov wrote:
> >
> >> +     if (WARN_ON(tid >= IEEE80211_NUM_TIDS))
> >> +             return -EINVAL;
> >
> > That validates < 16
> >
> >> +     queues = BIT(sdata->vif.hw_queue[ieee802_1d_to_ac[tid]]);
> >
> > but that's only valid for < 8, causing a smatch warning.
> 
> It's a valid warning. It should be tid & 7 here. I'll send a fix.

yes, but I think &7 is wrong too - TIDs (really TSIDs) 8-15 don't have a
static AC mapping, and we don't support them anyway. I think the sanity
check should just make sure it's < 8.

johannes

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to