On Fri, 2014-12-12 at 15:28 +0100, Felix Fietkau wrote: > > Management (and maybe control) frames can have different priorities as > > well, this is only used for something with TDLS now I think though. > With my implementation, those would go through the normal tx codepath, > bypassing the software tx queues. Can you think of anything else that > would need per-AC vif queues?
Not off the top of my head. I just didn't even quite understand that you were still using the normal tx path johannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
