These drivers use 9100-byte receive buffers, thus allocating an skb requires
an O(3) memory allocation. Under heavy memory loads and fragmentation, such
a request can fail. Previous versions of the driver have dropped the packet
and reused the old buffer; however, the new version introduced a bug in that
it released the old buffer before trying to allocate a new one. The previous
method is implemented here. The skb is unmapped before any attempt is made to
allocate another.

Signed-off-by: Larry Finger <[email protected]>
Cc: Stable <[email protected]>  [v3.18]
Reported-by: Eric Biggers <[email protected]>
Cc: Eric Biggers <[email protected]>
---

V2 - Fixes an error in the logic of V1. Realtek is working on a change to
     the RX buffer allocation, but that is likely to be too invasive for
     a fix to -rc or stable. In the meantime, this will help.
v3 - Unmap skb before trying to allocate a new one so as to not leak mapping.

Larry
---

 drivers/net/wireless/rtlwifi/pci.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

Index: wireless-drivers/drivers/net/wireless/rtlwifi/pci.c
===================================================================
--- wireless-drivers.orig/drivers/net/wireless/rtlwifi/pci.c
+++ wireless-drivers/drivers/net/wireless/rtlwifi/pci.c
@@ -666,7 +666,8 @@ tx_status_ok:
 }
 
 static int _rtl_pci_init_one_rxdesc(struct ieee80211_hw *hw,
-                                   u8 *entry, int rxring_idx, int desc_idx)
+                                   struct sk_buff *new_skb, u8 *entry,
+                                   int rxring_idx, int desc_idx)
 {
        struct rtl_priv *rtlpriv = rtl_priv(hw);
        struct rtl_pci *rtlpci = rtl_pcidev(rtl_pcipriv(hw));
@@ -674,11 +675,15 @@ static int _rtl_pci_init_one_rxdesc(stru
        u8 tmp_one = 1;
        struct sk_buff *skb;
 
+       if (likely(new_skb)) {
+               skb = new_skb;
+               goto remap;
+       }
        skb = dev_alloc_skb(rtlpci->rxbuffersize);
        if (!skb)
                return 0;
-       rtlpci->rx_ring[rxring_idx].rx_buf[desc_idx] = skb;
 
+remap:
        /* just set skb->cb to mapping addr for pci_unmap_single use */
        *((dma_addr_t *)skb->cb) =
                pci_map_single(rtlpci->pdev, skb_tail_pointer(skb),
@@ -686,6 +691,7 @@ static int _rtl_pci_init_one_rxdesc(stru
        bufferaddress = *((dma_addr_t *)skb->cb);
        if (pci_dma_mapping_error(rtlpci->pdev, bufferaddress))
                return 0;
+       rtlpci->rx_ring[rxring_idx].rx_buf[desc_idx] = skb;
        if (rtlpriv->use_new_trx_flow) {
                rtlpriv->cfg->ops->set_desc(hw, (u8 *)entry, false,
                                            HW_DESC_RX_PREPARE,
@@ -781,6 +787,7 @@ static void _rtl_pci_rx_interrupt(struct
                /*rx pkt */
                struct sk_buff *skb = rtlpci->rx_ring[rxring_idx].rx_buf[
                                      rtlpci->rx_ring[rxring_idx].idx];
+               struct sk_buff *new_skb;
 
                if (rtlpriv->use_new_trx_flow) {
                        rx_remained_cnt =
@@ -807,6 +814,13 @@ static void _rtl_pci_rx_interrupt(struct
                pci_unmap_single(rtlpci->pdev, *((dma_addr_t *)skb->cb),
                                 rtlpci->rxbuffersize, PCI_DMA_FROMDEVICE);
 
+               /* get a new skb - if fail, old one will be reused */
+               new_skb = dev_alloc_skb(rtlpci->rxbuffersize);
+               if (unlikely(!new_skb)) {
+                       pr_err("Allocation of new skb failed in %s\n",
+                              __func__);
+                       goto no_new;
+               }
                if (rtlpriv->use_new_trx_flow) {
                        buffer_desc =
                          &rtlpci->rx_ring[rxring_idx].buffer_desc
@@ -911,14 +925,16 @@ static void _rtl_pci_rx_interrupt(struct
                        schedule_work(&rtlpriv->works.lps_change_work);
                }
 end:
+               skb = new_skb;
+no_new:
                if (rtlpriv->use_new_trx_flow) {
-                       _rtl_pci_init_one_rxdesc(hw, (u8 *)buffer_desc,
+                       _rtl_pci_init_one_rxdesc(hw, skb, (u8 *)buffer_desc,
                                                 rxring_idx,
-                                              rtlpci->rx_ring[rxring_idx].idx);
+                                                
rtlpci->rx_ring[rxring_idx].idx);
                } else {
-                       _rtl_pci_init_one_rxdesc(hw, (u8 *)pdesc, rxring_idx,
+                       _rtl_pci_init_one_rxdesc(hw, skb, (u8 *)pdesc,
+                                                rxring_idx,
                                                 
rtlpci->rx_ring[rxring_idx].idx);
-
                        if (rtlpci->rx_ring[rxring_idx].idx ==
                            rtlpci->rxringcount - 1)
                                rtlpriv->cfg->ops->set_desc(hw, (u8 *)pdesc,
@@ -1307,7 +1323,7 @@ static int _rtl_pci_init_rx_ring(struct
                rtlpci->rx_ring[rxring_idx].idx = 0;
                for (i = 0; i < rtlpci->rxringcount; i++) {
                        entry = &rtlpci->rx_ring[rxring_idx].buffer_desc[i];
-                       if (!_rtl_pci_init_one_rxdesc(hw, (u8 *)entry,
+                       if (!_rtl_pci_init_one_rxdesc(hw, NULL, (u8 *)entry,
                                                      rxring_idx, i))
                                return -ENOMEM;
                }
@@ -1332,7 +1348,7 @@ static int _rtl_pci_init_rx_ring(struct
 
                for (i = 0; i < rtlpci->rxringcount; i++) {
                        entry = &rtlpci->rx_ring[rxring_idx].desc[i];
-                       if (!_rtl_pci_init_one_rxdesc(hw, (u8 *)entry,
+                       if (!_rtl_pci_init_one_rxdesc(hw, NULL, (u8 *)entry,
                                                      rxring_idx, i))
                                return -ENOMEM;
                }
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to