On 30 January 2015 at 13:58, Johannes Berg <[email protected]> wrote: > >> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/core.h > >> @@ -277,6 +282,7 @@ struct ath10k_vif { >> dma_addr_t beacon_paddr; >> >> struct ath10k *ar; >> + struct ath10k_chanctx *arctx; > > you also have vif->chanctx_conf pointer, which you could use > > ultimately it's a software architecture decision - personally I wouldn't > want to duplicate all that data and the lists etc. in the driver when > mac80211 has them, but that's just my opinion. :)
I'm a bit reluctant to freely use mac80211 owned structures out of mac80211_ops callback context, i.e. from a tasklet fearing inconsistencies. Or am I worrying unnecessarily? If so I guess I'll redo this and use mac80211's structures directly :-) Michał -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
