From: Eric Dumazet <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2015 11:49:23 -0800

> Size of skb->cb[] is not the major factor. Trying to gain 4 or 8 bytes
> is not going to improve performance a lot.
> 
> The real problem is that we clear it in skb_alloc()/build_skb(), instead
> of each layer doing so at demand, and only the part that matters for
> this layer.
> 
> Basically, skb->cb[] could be 80 or 160 bytes instead of 48, and we
> should not care, as long as no layer does a stupid/lazy 
> 
> memset(skb->cb, 0, sizeof(skb->cb))
> 
> Presumably skb_clone() could be extended to receive the length of
> skb->cb[] that current layer cares about.

Regardless, I think Florian's work has value.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to