Re: [PATCH 4/5] wil6210: stop_ap to leave interface closed

[Johannes Berg]

>>> "closed" is rather misleading, since you most certainly should *not*
>do
>>> dev_close() [and don't, but how should I know reading the commit
>log?]
>>> 
>>> johannes
>>> 
>>
>> Yes, I see.
>> I meant that actually stop_ap leaves device in state similar to
>ndo_stop,
>> where it is non operational.
>>
>> Would you suggest better wording? "Inactive", "down", "non
>operational"
>> or something else?
>
>Isn't "down" good enough here? So can I change it to:

Well that kinda proves my point - down is wrong.

Carrier turned off is probably the right thing to do here.

johannes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html