Amitkumar Karwar <[email protected]> writes:

> Hi Andreas,
>
> Thanks for the patch series.
>
>> 
>> Card reset is implemented by removing/re-adding the adapter instance.
>> This is implemented by removing the mmc host, which will then trigger a
>> cascade of removal callbacks including mwifiex_sdio_remove.
>> The dead-lock results in the latter function, trying to cancel the work
>> item executing the mmc host removal. This patch adds a driver level, not
>> adapter level, work struct to break the dead-lock
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Andreas Fenkart <[email protected]>
>> ---
>>  drivers/net/wireless/mwifiex/main.h |  1 -
>> drivers/net/wireless/mwifiex/sdio.c | 63 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>> ------
>>  2 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>> 
>
> We had recently submitted a patch to address this issue. So these two
> patches won't be needed now.
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-wireless/msg135146.html
>
> Could you please check and let us know if you have any suggestions for
> improvement?

Ok, so we are talking about this commit which apparently fell through
the cracks:

https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/kvalo/wireless-drivers-next.git/commit/?id=2f5872b60146

Like I said as a reply to patch 1, using static variables for this is
ugly. Isn't there really any better way to handle the problem?

-- 
Kalle Valo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to