On Wed, 2015-05-13 at 09:16 +0000, Michal Kazior wrote:
> There was a possible race between
> ieee80211_reconfig() and
> ieee80211_delayed_tailroom_dec(). This could
> result in inability to transmit data if driver
> crashed during roaming or rekeying and subsequent
> skbs with insufficient tailroom appeared.
>
> This race was probably never seen in the wild
> because a device driver would have to crash AND
> recover within 0.5s which is very unlikely.
>
> I was able to prove this race exists after
> changing the delay to 10s locally and crashing
> ath10k via debugfs immediately after GTK
> rekeying. In case of ath10k the counter went below
> 0. This was harmless but other drivers which
> actually require tailroom (e.g. for WEP ICV or
> MMIC) could end up with the counter at 0 instead
> of >0 and introduce insufficient skb tailroom
> failures because mac80211 would not resize skbs
> appropriately anymore.
>
> Fixes: 8d1f7ecd2af5 ("mac80211: defer tailroom counter manipulation when
> roaming")
> Signed-off-by: Michal Kazior <[email protected]>
> ---
>
> Notes:
> While doing PATCH v2 [1/2] I've noticed a subtle bug in the
> delayed tailroom counter logic. Since this touches the
> codepaths [1/2] does I'm posting this as a pair.
>
> net/mac80211/key.c | 5 ++++-
> net/mac80211/main.c | 3 +++
> 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/mac80211/key.c b/net/mac80211/key.c
> index 577a11a13cdf..4c6f8c97d11a 100644
> --- a/net/mac80211/key.c
> +++ b/net/mac80211/key.c
> @@ -695,10 +695,13 @@ void ieee80211_reset_crypto_tx_tailroom(struct
> ieee80211_sub_if_data *sdata)
> mutex_lock(&sdata->local->key_mtx);
>
> sdata->crypto_tx_tailroom_needed_cnt = 0;
> + sdata->crypto_tx_tailroom_pending_dec = 0;
>
> if (sdata->vif.type == NL80211_IFTYPE_AP) {
> - list_for_each_entry(vlan, &sdata->u.ap.vlans, u.vlan.list)
> + list_for_each_entry(vlan, &sdata->u.ap.vlans, u.vlan.list) {
> vlan->crypto_tx_tailroom_needed_cnt = 0;
> + vlan->crypto_tx_tailroom_pending_dec = 0;
> + }
> }
>
> mutex_unlock(&sdata->local->key_mtx);
> diff --git a/net/mac80211/main.c b/net/mac80211/main.c
> index 3c956c5f99b2..d8e1cbdcbc43 100644
> --- a/net/mac80211/main.c
> +++ b/net/mac80211/main.c
> @@ -246,6 +246,7 @@ static void ieee80211_restart_work(struct work_struct
> *work)
> {
> struct ieee80211_local *local =
> container_of(work, struct ieee80211_local, restart_work);
> + struct ieee80211_sub_if_data *sdata;
>
> /* wait for scan work complete */
> flush_workqueue(local->workqueue);
> @@ -254,6 +255,8 @@ static void ieee80211_restart_work(struct work_struct
> *work)
> "%s called with hardware scan in progress\n", __func__);
>
> rtnl_lock();
> + list_for_each_entry(sdata, &local->interfaces, list)
> + cancel_delayed_work_sync(&sdata->dec_tailroom_needed_wk);
Would it make sense to just flush the work here? That way we don't have
to do all the other things.
johannes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
