On Fri, 2015-05-29 at 13:34 +0200, Michal Kazior wrote: > > I'm a bit undecided about this. Is this really the only place that > > assumes use_4addr implies that it's a VLAN, in a context like this? > > Hmm.. I guess TDLS could also have use_4addr and still be a > IFTYPE_STATION, right?
No, TDLS can neither get here (VLAN assignment) nor does it actually set use_4addr. The only other thing that can set use_4addr is the station interface itself, but then we also can't get here. That wasn't really my point though - I was thinking more along the lines of code in rx.c, tx.c that just checks use_4addr? Not really sure. johannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
