On 06/06/2015 06:02 AM, Taehee Yoo wrote:
The variable "fw_version" is used in the _ResetDigitalProcedure1().
but It is not initialized. so I add init codes for "fw_version" and
"fw_subversion".

Signed-off-by: Taehee Yoo <[email protected]>
---
  drivers/net/wireless/rtlwifi/rtl8192c/fw_common.c | 2 ++
  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/rtlwifi/rtl8192c/fw_common.c 
b/drivers/net/wireless/rtlwifi/rtl8192c/fw_common.c
index 29983bc..9b5ce28 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/rtlwifi/rtl8192c/fw_common.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/rtlwifi/rtl8192c/fw_common.c
@@ -233,6 +233,8 @@ int rtl92c_download_fw(struct ieee80211_hw *hw)
        pfwheader = (struct rtl92c_firmware_header *)rtlhal->pfirmware;
        pfwdata = (u8 *)rtlhal->pfirmware;
        fwsize = rtlhal->fwsize;
+       rtlhal->fw_version = pfwheader->version;
+       rtlhal->fw_subversion = pfwheader->subversion;

        if (IS_FW_HEADER_EXIST(pfwheader)) {
                RT_TRACE(rtlpriv, COMP_FW, DBG_DMESG,

This patch is not correct. If the firmware does not have a header, then you will be changing fw_version and fw_subversion to random bytes from the body of the firmware. At present, they are initialized to zero as part of the rtl_priv struct. You need to move the two new statements inside the IS_FW_HEADER_EXIST test, but before pfwdata is adjusted to remove the header.

Larry


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to