In reg_process_hint, the test of "treatment == REG_REQ_IGNORE ||
treatment == REG_REQ_ALREADY_SET" is superfluous because the code in the
if-then branch is identical to the code after the if statement.

Coverity CID #1295939

Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <[email protected]>
---
 net/wireless/reg.c | 3 ---
 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/wireless/reg.c b/net/wireless/reg.c
index d359e0610198..fe6b0c6cca10 100644
--- a/net/wireless/reg.c
+++ b/net/wireless/reg.c
@@ -2080,9 +2080,6 @@ static void reg_process_hint(struct regulatory_request 
*reg_request)
                return;
        case NL80211_REGDOM_SET_BY_USER:
                treatment = reg_process_hint_user(reg_request);
-               if (treatment == REG_REQ_IGNORE ||
-                   treatment == REG_REQ_ALREADY_SET)
-                       return;
                return;
        case NL80211_REGDOM_SET_BY_DRIVER:
                if (!wiphy)
-- 
2.1.0

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to