On Tue, 2015-12-08 at 21:08 +0530, Krishna Chaitanya wrote:
>
> > void ieee80211_vht_handle_opmode(struct ieee80211_sub_if_data
> > *sdata,
> > struct sta_info *sta, u8 opmode,
> > - enum ieee80211_band band, bool
> > nss_only)
> > + enum ieee80211_band band)
> > {
> > struct ieee80211_local *local = sdata->local;
> > struct ieee80211_supported_band *sband = local->hw.wiphy-
> > >bands[band];
> >
> > - u32 changed = __ieee80211_vht_handle_opmode(sdata, sta,
> > opmode,
> > - band,
> > nss_only);
> > + u32 changed = __ieee80211_vht_handle_opmode(sdata, sta,
> > opmode, band);
> >
> > if (changed > 0)
> > rate_control_rate_update(local, sband, sta,
> > changed);
>
> Not related to current change.
>
> I was looking at this code a while ago and found that
> rate_control_rate_update
> doesn't update the rates from rx_nss, rather it updates from HT/VHT
> capabilities.
>
> So how does the NSS update from OP MODE IE work?
>
Huh? You just quoted the code that does this?
If the rate control algorithm doesn't look at sta->sta.rx_nss then
that's their bug.
johannes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
