Hi Singh,
This looks a lot better than the initial version.
I only have one question:
On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 06:40:20AM -0500, Shikha Singh wrote:
> +/*
> + * st95hf_send_recv_cmd() is for sending commands to ST95HF
> + * that are described in the cmd_array[]. It can optionally
> + * receive the response if the cmd request is of type
> + * SYNC. For that to happen caller must pass true to recv_res.
> + * For ASYNC request, recv_res is ignored and the
> + * function will never try to receive the response on behalf
> + * of the caller.
> + */
> +static int st95hf_send_recv_cmd(struct st95hf_context *st95context,
> + enum st95hf_cmd_list cmd,
> + int no_modif,
> + struct param_list *list_array,
> + bool recv_res)
> +{
> + unsigned char spi_cmd_buffer[MAX_CMD_LEN];
> + int i, ret;
> + struct device *dev = &st95context->spicontext.spidev->dev;
How do you know this driver is still valid at that point ?
It seems to be a potential corner case against the driver's remove
function, but it seems to be a race nevertheless.
Cheers,
Samuel.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
