Hi Henning,

[auto build test WARNING on mac80211-next/master]
[also build test WARNING on v4.5-rc1 next-20160129]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help 
improving the system]

url:    
https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Henning-Rogge/mac80211-add-cleanup-path-for-MPP-table-entries/20160129-181045
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jberg/mac80211-next.git 
master
reproduce:
        # apt-get install sparse
        make ARCH=x86_64 allmodconfig
        make C=1 CF=-D__CHECK_ENDIAN__


sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)

   include/linux/compiler.h:228:8: sparse: attribute 'no_sanitize_address': 
unknown attribute
>> net/mac80211/mesh_pathtbl.c:60:10: sparse: incompatible types in comparison 
>> expression (different address spaces)
>> net/mac80211/mesh_pathtbl.c:60:10: sparse: incompatible types in comparison 
>> expression (different address spaces)
>> net/mac80211/mesh_pathtbl.c:60:10: sparse: incompatible types in comparison 
>> expression (different address spaces)
>> net/mac80211/mesh_pathtbl.c:60:10: sparse: incompatible types in comparison 
>> expression (different address spaces)
>> net/mac80211/mesh_pathtbl.c:60:10: sparse: incompatible types in comparison 
>> expression (different address spaces)
>> net/mac80211/mesh_pathtbl.c:60:10: sparse: incompatible types in comparison 
>> expression (different address spaces)
>> net/mac80211/mesh_pathtbl.c:60:10: sparse: incompatible types in comparison 
>> expression (different address spaces)
>> net/mac80211/mesh_pathtbl.c:60:10: sparse: incompatible types in comparison 
>> expression (different address spaces)
>> net/mac80211/mesh_pathtbl.c:60:10: sparse: incompatible types in comparison 
>> expression (different address spaces)

vim +60 net/mac80211/mesh_pathtbl.c

    44  static struct mesh_table __rcu *mpp_paths; /* Store paths for MPP&MAP */
    45  
    46  int mesh_paths_generation;
    47  int mpp_paths_generation;
    48  
    49  /* This lock will have the grow table function as writer and add / 
delete nodes
    50   * as readers. RCU provides sufficient protection only when reading the 
table
    51   * (i.e. doing lookups).  Adding or adding or removing nodes requires 
we take
    52   * the read lock or we risk operating on an old table.  The write lock 
is only
    53   * needed when modifying the number of buckets a table.
    54   */
    55  static DEFINE_RWLOCK(pathtbl_resize_lock);
    56  
    57  
    58  static inline struct mesh_table *resize_dereference_paths(struct 
mesh_table *table)
    59  {
  > 60    return rcu_dereference_protected(table,
    61      lockdep_is_held(&pathtbl_resize_lock));
    62  }
    63  
    64  static inline struct mesh_table *resize_dereference_mesh_paths(void)
    65  {
    66          return resize_dereference_paths(mesh_paths);
    67  }
    68  

---
0-DAY kernel test infrastructure                Open Source Technology Center
https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all                   Intel Corporation
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to