From: Xinming Hu <[email protected]>

drv_pkt_delay_max should be assigned non-zero value, so that
packet delay can be accumulate in the right way.

Signed-off-by: Xinming Hu <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Amitkumar Karwar <[email protected]>
---
 drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/main.h | 1 +
 drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/wmm.c  | 1 +
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/main.h 
b/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/main.h
index 89a1576..0433977 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/main.h
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/main.h
@@ -298,6 +298,7 @@ struct mwifiex_tid_tbl {
 #define WMM_HIGHEST_PRIORITY           7
 #define HIGH_PRIO_TID                          7
 #define LOW_PRIO_TID                           0
+#define MWIFIEX_WMM_DRV_DELAY_MAX 510
 
 struct mwifiex_wmm_desc {
        struct mwifiex_tid_tbl tid_tbl_ptr[MAX_NUM_TID];
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/wmm.c 
b/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/wmm.c
index 499e5a7..0eb2465 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/wmm.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/wmm.c
@@ -438,6 +438,7 @@ mwifiex_wmm_init(struct mwifiex_adapter *adapter)
                mwifiex_set_ba_params(priv);
                mwifiex_reset_11n_rx_seq_num(priv);
 
+               priv->wmm.drv_pkt_delay_max = MWIFIEX_WMM_DRV_DELAY_MAX;
                atomic_set(&priv->wmm.tx_pkts_queued, 0);
                atomic_set(&priv->wmm.highest_queued_prio, HIGH_PRIO_TID);
        }
-- 
1.8.1.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to