On 2016-03-03 16:07, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-03-03 at 16:03 +0100, Felix Fietkau wrote:
>> 
>> > This isn't *quite* right, since you have to take an 802.11 header
>> > (vs.
>> > an ethernet header) into account, I think?
>> It's only a rough approximation anyway to prevent very large A-MSDUs
>> from being created with low rates.
>> 
> 
> Right, but it seemed like the intent was to allow two full-MTU sized
> frames to be combined, which this doesn't.
I'll look into it some more to see if it's better to change the comment
or the code in this case.

- Felix
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to