Hi Dan,

On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 10:01 PM, Dan Carpenter
<[email protected]> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 01:29:39PM +1100, Julian Calaby wrote:
>> From: Markus Elfring <[email protected]>
>>
>> Rename a jump label according to the current Linux coding style convention.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <[email protected]>
>> [Rewrote commit title]
>> Signed-off-by: Julian Calaby <[email protected]>
>>
>> ---
>>
>> This was controversial when introduced, however the change is obvious and
>> harmless and is, in the worst case, just churn.
>>
>> I'm only including this as it meets my criteria for sheparding pending
>> patches: it's sane, obviously correct or reviewable by me, and doesn't
>> require any work to apply.
>>
>> This does meet those requirements, however given how controviersial it was
>> when introduced, I'm not expecting people to be enthusiastic about
>> applying it.
>>
>> Thanks,
>
> It's a bad idea to mark this sort of patch as controversial.  It's
> bikeshed stuff.  Either apply it or don't but don't lets spend any more
> time thinking about it.
>
> Actual controversial patches have a long term impact.

Noted. I'll label anything like this (someone's done the work but it
makes no difference if it's applied) as "bikeshed" or "churn" in the
future.

Thanks,

-- 
Julian Calaby

Email: [email protected]
Profile: http://www.google.com/profiles/julian.calaby/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to