On 6-5-2016 18:02, Kalle Valo wrote:
> Jaap Jan Meijer <[email protected]> writes:
>
>> 2016-05-06 16:12 GMT+01:00 Kalle Valo <[email protected]>:
>>> Jaap Jan Meijer <[email protected]> writes:
>>>
>>>> Hi Kalle,
>>>>
>>>> Op vr 6 mei 2016 12:52 schreef Kalle Valo <[email protected]>:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> This has multiple issues:
>>>>
>>>> o Use your full name.
>>>> o Use prefix "brcmfmac: " in the title.
>>>>
>>>> o I can't find commit f654d13, is the commit id really correct?
>>>> o Also check from SubmittingPatches how you should reference commit
>>>> ids.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thank you for the feedback, I will send a reworked patch as soon as I get
>>>> home
>>>> next week. Also I did this against v4.4.8 so I'll have to rebase it as
>>>> well.
>>>>
>>>> I'm not sure what went wrong with the commit hash, its actually this
>>>> commit:
>>>> 1f0dc59a6de93586fcfc04696a61946408ffc56a.
>>>
>>> That commit id looks to be valid.
>>>
>>>> I see you did this commit, maybe you can check if this actually is the root
>>>> cause? I'm sure you have a lot more insight into this issue than I do.
>
> I just commited the patch. Broadcom folks (CCed) should be able to
> answer better, most likely they missed this patch as the title didn't
> have "brcmfmac".
Hi Kalle,
I did see the patch and noticed the procedural issues as well. However,
last week was a short week over here and I did not get to it to respond.
The fix is not done properly. The function determines the RSSI from the
per-chain values. I suspect that Jaap Jan is using a device which does
not report per-chain values so his solution should be used as fallback.
So can you revert the patch so Jaap Jan can rework the patch, ie.:
if (count_rssi) {
:
} else if (test_bit(BRCMF_VIF_STATUS_CONNECTED,
&ifp->vif->sme_state)) {
memset(&scb_val, 0, sizeof(scb_val));
err = brcmf_fil_cmd_data_get(ifp, BRCMF_C_GET_RSSI,
&scb_val, sizeof(scb_val));
if (err) {
brcmf_err("Could not get rssi (%d)\n", err);
goto done;
} else {
rssi = le32_to_cpu(scb_val.val);
sinfo->filled |= BIT(NL80211_STA_INFO_SIGNAL);
sinfo->signal = rssi;
brcmf_dbg(CONN, "RSSI %d dBm\n", rssi);
}
}
Let me know if that is ok or should I submit a fixup patch.
Regards,
Arend
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
