Hi Johannes,

>> Speaking of indentation, can you point me to a doc of the rules I
should follow?

You've seen Documentation/CodingStyle?

Of course. But that one doesn't discuss that you want your function parameters to be aligned to the opening '('. Is there a dialect document specific to linux-wireless?


I can confirm that I sanity checked this patch. Both ATTR_WIPHY,
ATTR_WDEV and wildcard dumps seemed to produce expected results.

I think it probably works due to the other conditions?

The initial conditions are that:
cb->args[0..2] == 0.

So on the first iteration we set filter_wiphy == -1 and check the filter attributes. If set, we modify filter_wiphy accordingly.

Even if filter_wiphy is set to 0, the if statement should still never be entered afterwards since wp_start and if_start are incremented.

Is this what you're worried about? Do you see a fault in my logic?

Regards,
-Denis
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to