> From: Kalle Valo [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Friday, September 09, 2016 4:58 PM
> To: Amitkumar Karwar
> Cc: [email protected]; Cathy Luo; Nishant Sarmukadam
> Subject: Re: mwifiex: PCIe8997 chip specific handling
> 
> Amitkumar Karwar <[email protected]> writes:
> 
> > Hi Kalle,
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: [email protected] [mailto:linux-wireless-
> >> [email protected]] On Behalf Of Kalle Valo
> >> Sent: Friday, September 09, 2016 2:45 PM
> >> To: Amitkumar Karwar
> >> Cc: [email protected]; Cathy Luo; Nishant Sarmukadam;
> >> Amitkumar Karwar
> >> Subject: Re: mwifiex: PCIe8997 chip specific handling
> >>
> >> Amitkumar Karwar <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> > The patch corrects the revision id register and uses it along with
> >> > magic value and chip version registers to download appropriate
> >> > firmware image.
> >> >
> >> > PCIe8997 Z chipset variant code has been removed, as it won't be
> >> > used in production.
> >> >
> >> > Signed-off-by: Amitkumar Karwar <[email protected]>
> >>
> >> Does apply, please rebase:
> >>
> >> Applying: mwifiex: PCIe8997 chip specific handling
> >> fatal: sha1 information is lacking or useless
> >> (drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/pcie.c).
> >> Repository lacks necessary blobs to fall back on 3-way merge.
> >> Cannot fall back to three-way merge.
> >> Patch failed at 0001 mwifiex: PCIe8997 chip specific handling
> >>
> >
> > The patch now smoothly applies to top of the tree. It had a dependency
> > with "mwifiex: add PCIe function level reset support" which is merged.
> > Let me know if there is still a problem.
> 
> Ok, I applied it now. But if there's a dependency to another patch
> please document it after the "---" line, a lot easier that way.
> 

Thanks. Sure. I will use "---" and take care of this for future patches.

Regards,
Amitkumar

Reply via email to