On Fri, 2016-10-07 at 07:42 +0000, Kushwaha, Purushottam wrote: > > > > However, it seems pretty easy to solve by passing another bool that > > indicates "all the same"? > Yes . Thanks . > We are planning to get the following changes in 2 commits . Let me > know your consent . > 1. cfg80211: Provision to allow the support for different beacon > intervals. ( Would like to go with this in a separate commit as the > current infrastructure also does not support the validation of > radar_detect / num_different_channel ) . > 2. cfg80211 : Check radar_detect and num_different_channels with > beacon interface combinations. > Seems fine, no driver will be able to advertise the different BIs inbetween the two patches anyway.
I think we might want to add another patch before or inbetween, that converts the far-too-long argument list of the combination iter/validation functions to a structure? johannes
