On 2016-12-15 13:01, Thiagarajan, Vasanthakumar wrote:
> On Thursday 15 December 2016 02:59 PM, Johannes Berg wrote:
>>> + * @IEEE80211_CONF_CHANGE_80211_HDR_OFFL: Offload configuration
>>> + * implementing 802.11 encap/decap for data frames changed.
>>> */
>>> enum ieee80211_conf_changed {
>>> IEEE80211_CONF_CHANGE_SMPS = BIT(1),
>>> @@ -1279,6 +1286,7 @@ enum ieee80211_conf_changed {
>>> IEEE80211_CONF_CHANGE_CHANNEL = BIT(6),
>>> IEEE80211_CONF_CHANGE_RETRY_LIMITS = BIT(7),
>>> IEEE80211_CONF_CHANGE_IDLE = BIT(8),
>>> + IEEE80211_CONF_CHANGE_80211_HDR_OFFL = BIT(9),
>>> };
>>
>> Given the requirements (PN check, etc.) I'm not sure how this can
>> change dynamically?
>
> I agree. Dynamic switch part is buggy, we can start with not allowing
> interfaces resulting in dynamic switch.
Does this mean that when bringing up multiple interfaces, users would
need to figure out the 'magic' order that works?
- Felix
