On 28 December 2016 at 21:39, Martin Blumenstingl
<[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 9:32 PM, Rafał Miłecki <[email protected]> wrote:
>> On 28 December 2016 at 21:05, Arend van Spriel
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> On 28-12-16 16:59, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
>>>> From: Rafał Miłecki <[email protected]>
>>>>
>>>> This new file should be used for properties handled at higher level and
>>>> so usable with all drivers.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki <[email protected]>
>>>> ---
>>>>  .../devicetree/bindings/net/wireless/ieee80211.txt       | 16 
>>>> ++++++++++++++++
>>>>  1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)
>>>>  create mode 100644 
>>>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/wireless/ieee80211.txt
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/wireless/ieee80211.txt 
>>>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/wireless/ieee80211.txt
>>>> new file mode 100644
>>>> index 0000000..c762769
>>>> --- /dev/null
>>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/wireless/ieee80211.txt
>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
>>>> +Common IEEE 802.11 properties
>>>> +
>>>> +This provides documentation of common properties that are handled by a 
>>>> proper
>>>> +net layer and don't require extra driver code.
>>>
>>> Please do not make any assumptions on how DT properties are handled nor
>>> by what. Just state that these properties apply to all wireless devices
>>> and are applicable to device specific bindings.
>>
>> OK, I'll try to improve this description.
>>
>>
>>>> +Optional properties:
>>>> + - ieee80211-min-center-freq : minimal supported frequency in KHz
>>>> + - ieee80211-max-center-freq : maximal supported frequency in KHz
>>>> +
>>>> +Example:
>>>> +
>>>> +pcie@0,0 {
>>>> +     reg = <0x0000 0 0 0 0>;
>>>> +     ieee80211-min-center-freq = <2437000>;
>>>> +     ieee80211-max-center-freq = <2457000>;
>>>> +};
>>>
>>> Is this the proper level to define it. I was expecting a child node of
>>> the pci(e) controller. Maybe I am misreading the example.
>>
>> This is device node, not a controller node (and yes, it's complete
>> node). You just need to add such a node inside the controller one.
> you should name the node wifi@0,0 instead. I revised my ath9k OF
> binding documentation due to similar concerns (and after seeing the
> result I must admit that they were right). you can have a look at the
> result here: [0]

Thanks for your comment, I'm far from considering myself DT expert, so
I often need help with such things, I'll change this in V2.

-- 
Rafał

Reply via email to