On 4 February 2017 at 14:39, Malinen, Jouni <jo...@qca.qualcomm.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 04, 2017 at 02:24:36PM +0000, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>> There is another issue I spotted: the skcipher you allocate may be of
>> the async variant, which may return from skcipher_encrypt() with
>> -EINPROGRESS as soon as it has queued the request. Since you don't
>> deal with that result, you should allocate a sync cipher explicitly:
>
>> diff --git a/net/mac80211/fils_aead.c b/net/mac80211/fils_aead.c
>> -       tfm2 = crypto_alloc_skcipher("ctr(aes)", 0, 0);
>> +       tfm2 = crypto_alloc_skcipher("ctr(aes)", 0, CRYPTO_ALG_ASYNC);
>
>> -       tfm2 = crypto_alloc_skcipher("ctr(aes)", 0, 0);
>> +       tfm2 = crypto_alloc_skcipher("ctr(aes)", 0, CRYPTO_ALG_ASYNC);
>
> Thanks! Can you send this as a full contribution or do you want me to
> do that?

Please go ahead if you don't mind doing it

> I did run this through all the FILS test cases with
> mac80211_hwsim.
>

Well, even async ciphers can act synchronously: the SIMD based async
ciphers will only enqueue the request for deferred processing when
called in interrupt context (on most architectures) but if you happen
to run on a platform that has a h/w accelerator for ctr(aes), you are
quite likely to see failures here.

>> Thanks for the instructions and thanks for testing. If I manage to run
>> this locally, I will follow up with an alternative patch #1 tha here
>> switches FILS to use cmac(aes) as well (which looks reasonably
>> feasible now that I understand the code)
>
> If you have any issues in getting the hwsim test setup working, please
> let me know. I'm trying to make it easy for anyone to run those tests in
> hopes of improving quality of Linux WLAN contributions and what gets
> applied into cfg80211 or mac80211 (or hostap.git for that matter). In
> particular the latest step-by-step guide I added for the VM version (*)
> was hoping to show how that can be done in 15 minutes from scratch..
>
>
> (*) http://w1.fi/cgit/hostap/plain/tests/hwsim/vm/example-vm-setup.txt
>

I will take a look on Monday

Reply via email to