On Tue, 2017-01-31 at 12:07 -0800, Rajkumar Manoharan wrote: > As moving average is not considering fractional part after > certain ratio, it will stuck at the same state. For example > with current values, moving average stuck at 96 and it will > not move forward. Fortunately current threshold is matching > against 95%. If thresold is increased more than 96, mesh path > never be deactivated under worst case. Fix failure average > movement by bumping up average at stuck state.
This is ... really strange to me. Can't we just actually take into account fractional parts instead? I think you should instead convert this to the EMWA helpers (see include/linux/average.h). johannes
