On Wed, 2017-02-15 at 10:36 +0100, Arend Van Spriel wrote:
> 
> > I'm not really sure what to do - we don't really want to print a
> > message on something that might have been received from the peer, I
> > think? Though I suppose we should return 0 for the invalid
> > combinations, indicating that they're not supported.
> 
> Ah. This is all non-functional code yet, right? At least having a
> static non-inline function in ieee80211.h will give build issues I
> would think.

No, I marked it __maybe_unused so it'll be fine. I didn't want to have
it inlined if you use it multiple times in a single source file, but I
didn't want to move it to somewhere else either ...

> Anyway, I would indeed return 0 and have caller deal with that.

Yeah, I'll do that.

johannes

Reply via email to