> +void regulatory_propagate_dfs_state(struct wiphy *wiphy,
> + struct cfg80211_chan_def
> *chandef,
> + enum nl80211_dfs_state
> dfs_state,
> + enum nl80211_radar_event event)
> +{
> + struct cfg80211_registered_device *rdev;
> +
> + ASSERT_RTNL();
> +
> + if (WARN_ON(!cfg80211_chandef_valid(chandef)))
> + return;
> +
> + if (WARN_ON(!(chandef->chan->flags & IEEE80211_CHAN_RADAR)))
> + return;
This warn on reliably triggers for me when I run the "ap_vht160" hwsim
test from wpa_supplicant.
I think there might be some confusion about this when parts of the 160
MHz channel require radar and parts don't? But I haven't looked into
this at all.
Please send me a fix ASAP so Jouni doesn't shout at me for test
failures :)
johannes
