On Fri, 2017-04-21 at 22:01 +0100, Arend van Spriel wrote: > I have been working on 4-way handshake offloading and one of the > things discussed was the addition of PORT_AUTHORIZED flag. So > this is what I came up with, but I suppose wpa_supplicant wants > to know whether it can expect this attribute or not. One option > is to have PORT_UNAUTHORIZED flag instead. Another option would > be introducing it as nl80211 protocol feature although not sure > if it could be considered as such. What do you guys think?
I think it could be, but I'm not really sure it matters? > + (cr->port_state != CONTROL_PORT_STATE_UNAUTHORIZED && > + nla_put_flag(msg, NL80211_ATTR_PORT_AUTHORIZED)) || > (cr->req_ie && > This doesn't really make sense - why does unspecified equal authorized? johannes
