On Fri, 2017-05-12 at 16:51 +0300, Kalle Valo wrote: > > But this does not mean that the gates are open for all possible hacks > via vendor commands, we still want to have generic nl80211 interface > for all normal functionality. Just to give some examples of something > which is NOT acceptable:
[snip scanning] > * power save settings > * btcoex settings I'm starting to think that these might really be a vendor API for anything but the most basic features - there's so much variation here now. OTOH, much of these shouldn't really be something the user needs to twiddle with anyway. > Comments? Am I forgetting something from the discussion? I think that's a good summary. johannes
