Is it advisable to re-submit with the noted corrections fixed?
On 18/05/17 15:47, Kalle Valo wrote: > Tom Gaudasiński <[email protected]> writes: > >> Make Epson WN7512BEP work by adding its device-id to rt2800usb. Device >> contains a Ralink RT3071L, registers as vendor Accton/Arcadyan. >> >> Signed-off-by: Tom Gaudasinski <[email protected]> > The prefix should be "rt2x00:". > >> --- linux/drivers/net/wireless/ralink/rt2x00/rt2800usb.c.orig >> 2017-05-17 19:49:44.893895819 +1000 >> +++ linux/drivers/net/wireless/ralink/rt2x00/rt2800usb.c 2017-05-17 >> 19:49:32.906111192 +1000 >> @@ -1156,6 +1156,8 @@ static struct usb_device_id rt2800usb_de >> { USB_DEVICE(0x2001, 0x3c17) }, >> /* Panasonic */ >> { USB_DEVICE(0x083a, 0xb511) }, >> + /* Accton/Arcadyan/Epson */ >> + { USB_DEVICE(0x083a, 0xb512) }, > The patch looks to be corrupted, didn't it test it though. Better use > 'git send-email' to submit patches. >
