Luciano Coelho <[email protected]> wrote:

> From: Andrei Otcheretianski <[email protected]>
> 
> If NAN interface is created with NL80211_ATTR_SOCKET_OWNER, the socket
> that is used to create the interface is used for all NAN operations and
> reporting NAN events.
> However, it turns out that sending commands and receiving events on
> the same socket is not possible in a completely race-free way:
> If the socket buffer is overflowed by the events, the command response
> will not be sent. In that case the caller will block forever on recv.
> Using non-blocking socket for commands is more complicated and still
> the command response or ack may not be received.
> So, keep unicasting NAN events to the interface creator, but allow
> using a different socket for commands.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andrei Otcheretianski <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <[email protected]>
> Reviewed-by: Johannes Berg <[email protected]>

Patch applied to wireless-drivers-next.git, thanks.

36a554cec119 nl80211: Don't verify owner_nlportid on NAN commands

-- 
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9810107/

https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches

Reply via email to