Arend van Spriel <[email protected]> writes: > On 7/27/2017 11:54 AM, Kalle Valo wrote: >> Larry Finger <[email protected]> writes: >> >>> From: Ping-Ke Shih <[email protected]> >>> >>> Because it isn't always correct to use EAPOL to check 4-way, >>> we add a timer to handle exception. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <[email protected]> >>> Signed-off-by: Larry Finger <[email protected]> >>> Cc: Yan-Hsuan Chuang <[email protected]> >>> Cc: Birming Chiu <[email protected]> >>> Cc: Shaofu <[email protected]> >>> Cc: Steven Ting <[email protected]> >> >> [...] >> >>> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/base.c >>> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/base.c >>> @@ -1408,6 +1408,11 @@ u8 rtl_is_special_data(struct ieee80211_hw *hw, >>> struct sk_buff *skb, u8 is_tx, >>> >>> return true; >>> } else if (ETH_P_PAE == ether_type) { >>> + /* EAPOL is seens as in-4way */ >>> + rtlpriv->btcoexist.btc_info.in_4way = true; >>> + rtlpriv->btcoexist.btc_info.in_4way_ts = jiffies; >>> + rtlpriv->btcoexist.btc_info.in_4way_ts = jiffies; >>> + >>> RT_TRACE(rtlpriv, (COMP_SEND | COMP_RECV), DBG_DMESG, >>> "802.1X %s EAPOL pkt!!\n", (is_tx) ? "Tx" : "Rx"); >> >> The indentation looks wrong. > > That wrongly indented line seems a bit redundant anyway :-p
Heh, indeed :) -- Kalle Valo
