On 7/26/2017 10:25 PM, Ian Molton wrote:
This function needs to be split up into separate read / write variants
for clarity.
Reviewed-by: Arend van Spriel <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ian Molton <[email protected]>
more comments below...
# Conflicts:
# drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/bcmsdh.c
---
.../wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/bcmsdh.c | 69 +++++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 47 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/bcmsdh.c
b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/bcmsdh.c
index 9d5716d0ad73..858ad2d8706b 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/bcmsdh.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/bcmsdh.c
[...]
@@ -706,10 +725,10 @@ int brcmf_sdiod_send_buf(struct brcmf_sdio_dev *sdiodev,
u8 *buf, uint nbytes)
err = brcmf_sdiod_addrprep(sdiodev, &addr);
if (!err)
- err = brcmf_sdiod_buffrw(sdiodev, SDIO_FUNC_2, true, addr,
- mypkt);
+ err = brcmf_sdiod_buff_write(sdiodev, SDIO_FUNC_2, addr, mypkt);
brcmu_pkt_buf_free_skb(mypkt);
+
You are keen on sprinkling whitespace here and there. Could you please
use separate patches for that as much as possible. Not sure why you
added this one...
return err;
...and kept this one.
}