On 08/18/2017 03:05 AM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
This is a static checker fix. "cal_num" is 10. We're declaring the tx_dt[] and rx_td[] arrays as 3 element arrays. The static checker complains that we do:tx_dt[cal] = (vdf_y[1]>>20)-(vdf_y[0]>>20); "cal" is the iterator and it is in the 0-9 range so it looks like we could corrupt memory. Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <[email protected]> --- I'm pretty sure this patch is correct and absolutely harmless. But the code is pretty involved and I didn't test it. So you may want to review this one carefully.
I believe the patch is correct. In testing, I also confirmed that this branch is executed, thus the memory corruption does happen.
Acked-by: Larry Finger <[email protected]> Thanks, Larry
