Daniel Drake <[email protected]> writes:

> On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 4:48 PM, Kalle Valo <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Enabling MSI by default is just too invasive, ath9k is used in so many
>> different enviroments that risk of regressions is high. MSI needs a lot
>> of testing before we can even consider enabling it by default.
>
> And it seems like we already found a regression here - the MSI Message
> Data is being corrupted as described in my last mail.

Exactly.

> Can't be fixed in firmware, but it would be good to have confirmation
> of the hardware behavivour, and maybe some other solution is possible?
> Are you following this up within Qualcomm?

No time to do that right now, sorry.

-- 
Kalle Valo

Reply via email to