On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 02:58:57PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 8:25 PM, Colin King <colin.k...@canonical.com> wrote: > > From: Colin Ian King <colin.k...@canonical.com> > > > > Pointer q is initialized and then almost immediately afterwards being > > re-assigned the same value. Remove the second redundant assignment. > > > > Don't you see strange that in the same context of the patch two users > of q are present? > > How did you test this? >
The patch is obviously correct, I don't understand the question. regards, dan carpenter
