On 3/2/2018 6:14 AM, Kalle Valo wrote:
Arend van Spriel <arend.vanspr...@broadcom.com> writes:
On 3/1/2018 6:59 PM, Tamizh chelvam wrote:
From: Tamizh chelvam <tami...@codeaurora.org>
This patch introduces NL80211_CMD_SET_BTCOEX command and
NL80211_ATTR_BTCOEX_OP attribute to enable or disable btcoex.
What kind of btcoex are we talking about here? Is it signalling
between wlan and bt to get access to the shared RF.
Yes, at least that's how I understand this.
Why would it require user-space interaction? Are there no options for
wlan to detect bt is in use, ie. bt hci is setup, and vice versa. Can
it be indicated in platform data or device tree. Trying to understand
the use-case here.
One use case is being able to disable btcoex in case of problems or to
test if it's btcoex related. I think during the last five years the need
for this interface has come every once in a while.
Well, you would want to disable btcoex *and* bt to verify wlan is
working properly on its own. And similarly disable btcoex *and* wlan to
verify bt works properly.
Now I do recall a thread between you and Marcel. Looked it up and it was
this thread , but did not see a follow-up on it. I suspect it
involves more than just an enable/disable state. That may be fine for
devices in which BT and WLAN are integrated and coordination of RF use
is done on the device. The "btcoex subsystem" thread seems to aim for
more like providing the coordination logic so independent BT device and
WLAN device can still use the same RF. So before adopting the api in
nl80211 it would be good to revive that thread.