Amitkumar Karwar <[email protected]> writes:
> From: Siva Rebbagondla <[email protected]>
>
> This patch adds a check to drop received broadcast/multicast frames if
> PN is invalid (i.e. not greater than last PN). bc_mc_pn
> variable added for each interface
>
> Signed-off-by: Siva Rebbagondla <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Amitkumar Karwar <[email protected]>
[...]
> +static int rsi_validate_pn(struct rsi_hw *adapter, struct ieee80211_hdr *hdr)
> +{
> + struct ieee80211_vif *vif;
> + struct ieee80211_bss_conf *bss;
> + struct vif_priv *vif_info = NULL;
> + u8 cur_pn[IEEE80211_CCMP_PN_LEN];
> + u8 *last_pn;
> + int i, hdrlen;
> +
> + if (!is_broadcast_ether_addr(hdr->addr1) &&
> + !is_multicast_ether_addr(hdr->addr1))
> + return 1;
> +
> + hdrlen = ieee80211_hdrlen(hdr->frame_control);
> + for (i = 0; i < adapter->sc_nvifs; i++) {
> + vif = adapter->vifs[i];
> +
> + if (!vif)
> + continue;
> + if (vif->type != NL80211_IFTYPE_STATION &&
> + vif->type != NL80211_IFTYPE_P2P_CLIENT)
> + continue;
> + bss = &vif->bss_conf;
> + if (!bss->assoc)
> + continue;
> + if (!ether_addr_equal(bss->bssid, hdr->addr2))
> + continue;
> + vif_info = (struct vif_priv *)vif->drv_priv;
> + if (!vif_info->key) {
> + vif_info = NULL;
> + continue;
> + }
> + if (!vif_info->rx_pn_valid) {
> + vif_info = NULL;
> + continue;
> + }
> + }
> + if (!vif_info)
> + return 1;
Why +1 here?
> + last_pn = vif_info->rx_bcmc_pn;
> + if (vif_info->key->cipher == WLAN_CIPHER_SUITE_CCMP) {
> + struct dot11_ccmp_hdr *ccmp =
> + (struct dot11_ccmp_hdr *)&((u8 *)hdr)[hdrlen];
> +
> + cur_pn[0] = ccmp->pn0;
> + cur_pn[1] = ccmp->pn1;
> + cur_pn[2] = ccmp->pn2;
> + cur_pn[3] = ccmp->pn3;
> + cur_pn[4] = ccmp->pn4;
> + cur_pn[5] = ccmp->pn5;
> + } else {
> + struct dot11_tkip_hdr *tkip =
> + (struct dot11_tkip_hdr *)&((u8 *)hdr)[hdrlen];
> +
> + cur_pn[0] = tkip->tsc0;
> + cur_pn[1] = tkip->tsc1;
> + cur_pn[2] = tkip->tsc2;
> + cur_pn[3] = tkip->tsc3;
> + cur_pn[4] = tkip->tsc4;
> + cur_pn[5] = tkip->tsc5;
> + }
> + for (i = (IEEE80211_CCMP_PN_LEN - 1); i >= 0; i--)
> + if (last_pn[i] ^ cur_pn[i])
> + break;
> + if (i < 0)
> + return -1;
And why -1 here? Please use real error codes (-EINVAL etc).
> @@ -1341,14 +1488,14 @@ static void rsi_fill_rx_status(struct ieee80211_hw
> *hw,
> }
> }
> if (!bss)
> - return;
> + return -1;
Here as well.
--
Kalle Valo
